设为首页  
联系我们  
加入收藏  
网页制作 冲浪宝典 图形图像 操作系统 软件教学 编程开发 认证考试 安全技术 站长专区 文学驿站 娱乐天地 游戏天地 办公软件
文章搜索
您的位置: 首页 >> 文章首页 >> 编程开发 >> 其他开发语言 >> Layers, Levels, and DIP
精品推荐
其他开发语言点击TOP10
·数字小键盘指法练习
·用C语言编通讯录程序(初学者级别的)
·Modem 常用AT指令集
·单片机模拟I2C总线及24C02(I2C EEPROM)读写实例(源代码)
·C++经典电子书下载
·Thinking in C++ 简体中文第二版
·debug和release的区别
·error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __ftol2 错误解决
·C库函数手册
·一个简单的C语言编译器
编程开发点击TOP10
·数字小键盘指法练习
·ASP.NET 程序中常用的三十三种代码
·用C语言编通讯录程序(初学者级别的)
·我写的Java学生成绩管理系统源代码
·CHK文件恢复工具
·Modem 常用AT指令集
·java笔试题
·异常java.sql.SQLException: Io exception:The Network Adapter could not establish connection
·单片机模拟I2C总线及24C02(I2C EEPROM)读写实例(源代码)
·C++经典电子书下载
精选专题

Layers, Levels, and DIP

作者: 来源:网络文章 时间:2005-12-17 18:57:03

Layers, Levels, and DIP(2) These two dimensions are apparent in the work of Steve Mellor and Gregor Kiczales. Both of them have tried to address this problem in different ways. Gregor created the notion of ASPects, so that infrastructure could be woven into an application, and could "Depend" on that application instead of the app depending on it. Indeed, AOP is a very interesting mechanism for conforming to DIP. Mellor created "translation" which is really just AOP at a higher level of abstraction. He created the infrastructure independent from the application, and then wrote another program called a translator to bind the two together. In both cases the infrastructure is orthogonal to the rest of the app.

The dilemma of level, and the two solutions, imply that we aren't thinking about this problem correctly. Infrastructure does not seem to be a layer at all. Somehow it is orthogonal to layers. Somehow it is both at a low level and at a high level. It's at a high level because it represents a policy for using the underlying platform. It's at a low level because it's a detail that most of the app wishes it didn't have to know about.

Perhaps the diagram should be drawn like this:

 UI--->APP--->DOM\----------------------/AINF
In other Words, the UI, APP, and DOM are traditional layers, with the dependencies pointing in the direction of abstraction. (Apparently this means the the greater the abstraction, the lower the level. I still don't understand why that is.) And these layers are somehow independent of the infrastructure, and the infrastructure somehow manages to make itself felt whether through AOP, or Translation, or some other mechanism.

Without AOP, or Translation, we might draw the diagram this way:

 UI--->APP--->DOM V VVUIinf APPinf DOMinf\----------------------/AINF
In other words, each of the layers uses an abstract interface that represents it's infrastructure needs. It does not know what infrastructure it will be using. It simply states it's needs through an abstract interface and eXPects the infrastructure to implement that interface and supply the required functionality.

共3页 9 7 [1] [2] [38 :>

Layers, Levels, and DIP 相关文章:
Layers, Levels, and DIP 相关软件:
特别声明:本站除部分特别声明禁止转载的专稿外的其他文章可以自由转载,但请务必注明出处和原始作者。文章版权归文章原始作者所有。对于被本站转载文章的个人和网站,我们表示深深的谢意。如果本站转载的文章有版权问题请联系编辑人员,我们尽快予以更正。
转载请注明来源:http://www.xgdown.com